Security Situation Worsens in Nepal - Los Angeles Times

1:12 AM PDT, August 12, 2005

By BINAJ GURUBACHARYA, Associated Press Writer

KATMANDU, Nepal -- The rebel victory appears to have been as unexpected as it was complete -- a battlefield win that has exposed the military weakness of Nepal's army and the political vulnerability of King Gyanendra's royal dictatorship.

Details of the assault are scant, but this much is known: the insurgents overran about 200 troops camped on a remote mountainside. At least 40 of the soldiers may have been executed. Dozens appear to have fled.

Days after Sunday's attack, the rebels' first major victory in months, the army has retaken the area around Tilli, about 340 miles northwest of Katmandu, and rescued some of the troops who fled. But the rebels say they are holding 50 soldiers prisoner, and even Nepalis who support the king say the attack was alarming.

"The king was the last hope for most of us, but if attacks like this continue there will be no future for Nepal," said Sharad Thapa, a government worker in the capital. "This is just terrible."

King Gyanendra seized power Feb. 1, saying that dismissing the democratically elected government and taking the reins himself was the only way to quash the insurgency. Nearly 12,000 people have been killed since the start of the rebellion in 1996.

The coup was condemned internationally, and major allies Britain, India and the United States suspended military aid.

At home, Nepalis were split -- there were a few ardent supporters of the stumbling politicians who King Gyanendra had usurped, but many people also distrusted the king.

Militarily, the king's move has produced mixed results. Attacks have dropped in larger towns, but little has changed in the countryside, where the rebels remain in control of large swaths of territory.

Sunday's attack, analysts and opposition leaders say, could seriously weaken the king.

Inderjit Rai, an independent political analyst in Katmandu, called it "a major blow to the government."

"It proves the security situation is still vulnerable in much of the country," he said. "If the government fails to take control of the security situation then they lose support from all the people."

"The attack has proved the king's claim of improved security to be nothing but hollow," said Ram Sharan Mahat of the Nepali Congress, the country's largest party.

The rebel leader who claims to have led the attack, a man known only as Prabhakar, said on the insurgent's Web site that the victory had "shaken the enemy," and proved that the guerillas could defeat the government on any battlefield. He said 26 rebel fighters were killed in the fighting.

The rebels have a strong presence across much of rural Nepal, particularly in areas where there are few military outposts, and they control much of the isolated mountainous region in the Himalayan nation's northwest and midwest.

While they are believed to have about 20,000 fighters, few observers believe they could defeat the king and take control of the nation.

So far, the king's main political opposition comes from political parties pressing to get back into power -- and not a popular movement like the one that forced the previous king, in 1990, to establish a democracy.

Some observers warn, however, that the incessant fighting between the palace and the political parties gives strength to the rebels.

The U.S. Ambassador to Nepal, James Moriarty, said Tuesday that "the continuing divisions between the Palace and the political parties aid only the Maoists and their plans to turn Nepal into a brutal and anachronistic state."

"The people want reconciliation. They want peace. The way to achieve peace is with a democratic government united against the Maoist assault on Nepal," he said. Sphere: Related Content